LogoLogo
  • Home
  • Projects
  • About
  • Contact

Flash is Dead… Long Live Flash

Devon O. · January 31, 2010 · Flash · 19 comments
8

Ordinarily I limit my posts about Flash here to its usage and just kind of sit on the sidelines when it comes to debates about its future. After all, though I make my living with the Flash Platform, I’m not an Adobe employee and they’re big enough boys to stand up for themselves amidst all the hullabaloo. And I’ve been working and playing with Flash since about 1999/2000 and if, during that time, I had a dollar for every time a new technology was the alleged “killer of Flash”, well, I’d have at least 10 or 20 bucks. Yet here it is 2010 and Flash is still here and as strong as ever. Recently, though, the whole HTML5 debacle has really reached the point where I thought I’d throw in my opinion. So here’s my 2 cents on the already way over capacity topic:

Everything is Propietary

One of the biggest divisions between Flash (and other plugins) and HTML5 is that one is proprietary while the other is an open standard. What I always ask myself though is where do these open standards come from – they don’t just appear? The answer, of course, is open standards are proposed, shaped, created, guided, and governed by committees. The committee, in essence, is the owner, or proprietor if you will, of an “open standard”. And who is it that sits on these committees creating the open standards? It ain’t Joe Developer making a living writing code for the web. It’s representatives of all the corporations who make the WWW possible – Adobe, Microsoft, Apple, Mozilla, Google, etc. Do you really think that these corporate reps are there trying to make the World Wide Web a shinier place for developers and users? To an extent, sure they are. But to a larger extent they’re doing what every corporation by its very nature does – following money.

Just look at what happened to ECMAscript 4. The language’s creator, Brendan Eich, himself welcomed the proposed changes. The language’s proprietor though, i.e. the committee, voted the changes down. Not because they wouldn’t have been welcomed by the developer community or because the changes were “unsound for the web”- but because they were financially unsound for certain groups within the committee. That’s the way things go with proprietors – they do what’s in their best interest. Supporters/developers of browser plugins are not out to undermine the web anymore than standards committees. Both exist to find a nice balance between making money and benefiting the community simultaneously. Neither are ipso facto evil.

On a personal note, I often find it rather humorous that many of the people who jump on the “Flash is evil because it’s proprietary” bandwagon come from the Mac community. Now if you want to rail against the Flash Player because it performs like crap on a Mac, well, fine, I can understand that and see your point. But to complain about the Flash Player because it’s a proprietary piece of software while at the same time supporting a company that makes Microsoft look like Google by comparison – well, I just have to laugh at them in the same way I laugh at vegetarians who say that eating meat is cruel to animals while sporting a stylish suede jacket…

Standards Aren’t

The word standard when applied to web development is a really misleading misnomer. It somehow implies that a single bit of code written for the web will run “standardly” in every browser on every platform. Obviously anyone who has ever done any bit of web programming knows that just ain’t the case. In this instance, HTML5 is barely out the door in beta form and is already being implemented differently on different browsers. Eventually (2012, 2014, or maybe not even until 2022 according to various sources), HTML5 might just settle down and assume a lowest common denominator standardization across most, if not all, browsers. Will the rest of the world rest on its laurels waiting for this though? Of course not. “Proprietary” plugins will continue making leaps and bounds while HTML5 slowly catches up to where the plugins are now. And let’s face it – HTML5 by itself is little more than a glorified video player without the addition of javascript to make it “do stuff”. Will javascript become “standardized” in every browser as well? Or will it still require checks and hacks to run regularly across the board? And, assuming it is implemented in a standard way, what will it take – another 2 to 10 years?

I’ll be the first to admit, Flash is not the end all be all of the web. As you may have noticed, this blog is not created in Flash. Why? Well, strictly speaking the Flash Platform sucks for blogs and for many other things as well. Flash has its place on the good ol’ www and it ain’t everywhere. Honestly though, right at this moment, Flash (Actionscript) is the closest thing there is to the programmers philosopher’s stone of  “write once, run everywhere”. Who knows – in 2 to 10 years time, HTML5 and javascript might have a similar distinction. But where will the Flash Player be at that time? It’s hard to say, but I’m guessing HTML6 will be running to catch up just as HTML5 is now.

Nothing Lasts Forever

Another argument against the use of Flash I frequently seen thrown around is that, because the software is proprietary, you’ll never know how long it will be supported. This to me is so patently absurd, it hardly calls for a comment. Is anyone out there still developing in HTML 1.0? Hell, at work we find ourselves in a strange (but I expect not uncommon) predicament. Our server is still installed with the open source PHP 4.something. Of course we would love to upgrade to PHP 5, but we first have to weigh the costs and benefits of having to repair the several apps that are liable to break when we do so. Meanwhile I can still view Flash sites from the late 90’s in Flash Player 10 (not that I’d want to, but that’s another story). I hate to be the one to break the news to anyone, but in this industry the one constant you can count on is change. Technologies both “open” and “proprietary” come and go and programming languages fall to the wayside like latin. To suggest to someone they shouldn’t develop for a specific proprietary platform because it has an uncertain future is like telling that same someone there’s no sense in learning HTML5 because it’ll eventually be replaced by HTML6 and you’ll have to dump your entire code base and learn something new. If absolute certainty in a specific field is that important to you, good luck in today’s world. Maybe plumbing would be a more suitable profession. There’ll probably always be pipes around and you’ll more than likely get paid more.

Code Breeds Bugs

Yet another argument I see against Flash is that Flash apps are often buggy and can lead to browser crashes or what have you. As has been pointed out time and time again this is a developer problem – not a platform problem. Who hasn’t been to a site where a database connection could not be made, a javascript error was thrown, or CSS wouldn’t render properly in the browser? Christ, even google.com doesn’t validate properly according to W3C standards. Does that mean that PHP, javascript, CSS, and HTML are all “bad”? Of course not. You’d have to be a drooling imbecile to even think so. And yet, for some reason, people who say things like “Flash crashed my browser, I’m getting a Flash blocker [plugin, mind you] and never looking at another Flash site” are taken seriously on a regular basis (well, at least by others who dislike Flash just as much). This line of “reasoning” makes absolutely no sense to me.

CPU usage is another item often held against the Flash plugin, yet there have been complaints of recent FWA winner 100 Tweets leading to 100% CPU usage on some machines. The more complicated systems get, the more error prone they become. If you really want a bug free web, let’s just go back to 100% static text and be done with it. But if you want images, animation, video, and interactivity expect the unexpected – whether you’re looking at these things in Flash, HTML, or anything else.

Time Will Tell

Here’s a little Sufi parable for you paraphrased from the wonderful Principia Discordia (fnord):

Malaclypse the Younger was once imprisoned and sentenced to death by the Shah for saying a few less than savory things. He went before the Shah and pleaded that if the Shah would just let him live one more year, Mal would teach his horse to fly. Well, no shah can turn up his nose at a flying horse, so he agreed to spare Mal for another year  under these conditions. Later, a fellow prisoner asked Malaclypse what this business with the flying horse was all about. “Well,” answered Mal, “A year is a very long time and lot can happen. The shah may have a change of heart, he may be overthrown, or he may just die of natural causes. And, if worse comes to worst, who knows, I might actually teach that damn horse to fly.”

The point being, HTML5 is still at least 2 years from being implemented in a widely usable fashion. By that time we should be on Flash Player 12 or 13, and who knows – the damn thing might just have flying horses. To declare Flash dead at this point is just silly. And for Steve Jobs to call Adobe lazy is being just plain childish. As Joa Ebert pointed out on Twitter today, Adobe is wrapping up a crosscompiler capable of creating iPhone apps with the Flash IDE while Apple just released a big iPod. Which of those is more interesting/less lazy?

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not anti Apple (I love my iPod) and I’m not anti-HTML5 (looking forward to learning and using it. And come to think of it, I haven’t heard a single person say they are against it. Interesting how willing Flash devs are to embrace new technology) and I’m no Adobe fan-boy (they’re a corporation looking to make money like any other and have plenty of room for improvement), I’m simply sick and tired of the rampant anti-Flash sentiments that have been circulating like wild fire lately.

When you can show me sites such as GE’s Smart Grid, or North Kingdom’s old Get the Glass (require the Flash Player plugin), or the Rexona Shopping Cart Race game (requires the both Flash and Unity3D plugins) built entirely on “open standards” then we can have a realistic discussion about the demise of browser plugin technology. Until that time, can’t we just say there is room enough for more than one technology in today’s web world and let them all advance as they may?

  Facebook   Pinterest   Twitter   Google+
  • The Old Snow Trick – In the Third Dimension
    February 13, 2008 · 0 comments
    1750
    2
    Read more
  • Playing With a Couple Game Ideas
    September 16, 2012 · 10 comments
    3750
    12
    Read more
  • Away3D + QuickBox2D (Finally)
    August 30, 2009 · 14 comments
    3020
    3
    Read more
19 Comments:
  1. Brilliant.

    Can I add a link to your post on my blog?

    Promethe · January 31, 2010
  2. Thanks for a good article.

    The HTML 5 examples I have seen has been laughable and no way that will replace Flash anytime soon… And my browser did freeze on a drag and drop example (as you said, a developer problem I guess). And how can you protect your work from being stolen? The code would be right there to download… at least it’s a bit more tricky to decode a .swf file… Really hope that Steve will lets us decide weater to install Flash or now..

    Keep up the good work Devon..

    Andreas · January 31, 2010
  3. Well put Devon!

    TJ Downes · January 31, 2010
  4. @Promethe – certainly…

    Devon O. · February 01, 2010
  5. Really awesome must read post! Thank you, Devon!

    Sergey Todyshev · February 01, 2010
  6. Really interesting point of view. Thanks.

    Pierrick · February 01, 2010
  7. A stone in quiet water :)
    Thanks

    nemrod · February 01, 2010
  8. Great post, Devon. I couldn’t agree more.

    Marcus · February 01, 2010
  9. Finally someone talks some sense in this mostly nitwitted dispute!

    Never knew you were a discordian, Devon!

    Shoom · February 02, 2010
  10. Yes and Yes. You hit the nail right on the head. Flash isn’t going anywhere- it’s what has allowed web technology to grow as it has. HTML5 wouldn’t have had the demand or goal to support video without the precursory plethora of sites using flash to embed video. Flash will continue to make the impossible possible – until it does finally become possible in HTML8.

    Evan Mullins · February 08, 2010
  11. Very interesting post. It made me rethink my Anti-Flash (for HTML5) decision. I still see the end of Flash as video players in a not too distant future, though.

    Another thing, which is very unlikely to happen, but that I would find interesting would be if Flash was openly released, turned into a web-compatible language and get submitted to the W3C as a new standard. This would allow browsers to support it natively, which would probably improve performance and reduce crash issues.

    But at the same time, there is already SVG.

    Magne Andersson · February 09, 2010
  12. Hey Magne, thanks for the comments. The main reason Adobe doesn’t open the Flash player (at least their public reason) is that if it was implemented differently, you’d never really know what version supported what. What makes Flash great for developers is that you know your app is likely to run standardly across different browsers/platforms (crashes and framerate not withstanding). If the Flash player was opened up it would require a larger codebase, different versions of your app for different browsers and OS’s, and much more testing – in which case you may as well just be using js/html…

    @Shoom – I first read the Illuminatus trilogy back in 85 and try to re-read it every couple years or so. Changed my life… Hail Eris!

    Devon O. · February 09, 2010
  13. Awesome post, which really made me think. The most interesting part is that it’s always a proprietor even in the most open projects. Now I realize that it’s always true. Question is which one you like the most. For example, normal ppl likes Apple more than Microsoft, which is logical. Apple didn’t for example make multiple crappy web browsers.

    However, open source software (which still has proprietors of some sort ofc) is critical for technological development. That is, because if there is only one company who can access the source, they have a monopoly, and monopoly is very dangerous when it comes to infrastructural matters. Video is like text and images, it’s content, which should be accessible for everyone.

    Nowadays A. Adobe practically owns online video and B. anyone who wants to build a new operating system is dependant of that Adobe develops a flash-player for that OS.

    Video is ready to go open source, and thus it should. What if you needed special glasses, only manufactured by one company, to read the newspaper? How is that for democracy? What if China bans Adobe products? :P Games and other random stuff I won’t complain on, but video is pretty serious.

    Didrik Nordström · February 11, 2010
  14. best damn discussion on this topic that i have read so far. this should be published far and wide.
    thank you for being reasonable, adult, and realistic.

    Carl · March 14, 2010

Leave a Comment! Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Devon O. Wolfgang

AIR | Unity3D | AR/VR

Unity Certified Developer

Technical Reviewer of “The Essential Guide to Flash CS4 AIR Development” and “Starling Game Development Essentials”

Reviewer of “The Starling Handbook”

Unity Engineer at Touch Press.

Categories
  • Actionscript (95)
  • AIR (16)
  • Flash (99)
  • Games (7)
  • Liberty (13)
  • Life (53)
  • Shaders (20)
  • Unity3D (21)
Recent Comments
  • MainDepth on Unity Ripple or Shock Wave Effect
  • Devon O. on Unity Ripple or Shock Wave Effect
  • Feral_Pug on Unity Ripple or Shock Wave Effect
  • bavvireal on Unity3D Endless Runner Part I – Curved Worlds
  • Danielius Vargonas on Custom Post Processing with the LWRP
Archives
  • December 2020 (1)
  • December 2019 (1)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • February 2019 (2)
  • December 2018 (1)
  • July 2018 (1)
  • June 2018 (1)
  • May 2018 (2)
  • January 2018 (1)
  • December 2017 (2)
  • October 2017 (1)
  • September 2017 (2)
  • January 2017 (1)
  • July 2016 (1)
  • December 2015 (2)
  • March 2015 (1)
  • September 2014 (1)
  • January 2014 (1)
  • August 2013 (1)
  • July 2013 (1)
  • May 2013 (1)
  • March 2013 (2)
  • December 2012 (1)
  • November 2012 (1)
  • September 2012 (3)
  • June 2012 (2)
  • May 2012 (1)
  • April 2012 (1)
  • December 2011 (2)
  • October 2011 (3)
  • September 2011 (1)
  • August 2011 (1)
  • July 2011 (1)
  • May 2011 (2)
  • April 2011 (2)
  • March 2011 (1)
  • February 2011 (1)
  • January 2011 (2)
  • December 2010 (3)
  • October 2010 (5)
  • September 2010 (1)
  • July 2010 (2)
  • May 2010 (5)
  • April 2010 (2)
  • March 2010 (7)
  • February 2010 (5)
  • January 2010 (5)
  • December 2009 (3)
  • November 2009 (1)
  • October 2009 (5)
  • September 2009 (5)
  • August 2009 (1)
  • July 2009 (1)
  • June 2009 (2)
  • May 2009 (6)
  • April 2009 (4)
  • March 2009 (2)
  • February 2009 (4)
  • January 2009 (1)
  • December 2008 (5)
  • November 2008 (2)
  • September 2008 (1)
  • August 2008 (6)
  • July 2008 (6)
  • June 2008 (9)
  • May 2008 (4)
  • April 2008 (3)
  • March 2008 (4)
  • February 2008 (9)
  • January 2008 (7)
  • December 2007 (6)
Copyright © 2021 Devon O. Wolfgang